Four parties: the OSCE/ODIHR final assessment of the elections provides legal and logical grounds for meeting the demand of the majority and the pro-Western democratic opposition to schedule a new election  

AI

OSCE/ODIHR’s Final Assessment of ‘s Elections

The OSCE/ODIHR, an that monitors elections, has given a very negative assessment of Georgia’s . In a joint statement, four parties say this evaluation is the most critical ever made by the organization in Georgia.

The OSCE/ODIHR concluded that the elections did not meet basic democratic standards and that citizens’ constitutional right to vote was not respected. The main reasons this were voter intimidation, media bias, unequal conditions, and violations of secrecy.

According to the opposition parties, the government has been deceiving voters by suggesting that the OSCE/ODIHR’s conclusion would legitimize their power. However, the OSCE/ODIHR’s assessment actually confirms the illegitimacy of the results and provides grounds for holding new elections.

The organization stated that its mandate is to assess the electoral process, not to determine the legitimacy of elections. The fact that it highlighted this issue in its conclusion indicates a significant problem with the election’s legitimacy.

The OSCE/ODIHR also noted several serious violations during the electoral process, including:

* Restrictions on fundamental freedoms and civil
* Politicization of institutions involved in the electoral process
* Voter pressure and intimidation
* Massive violations of ballot secrecy
* Inadequate handling of complaints
* Violent suppression of
* Polarization and instrumentalization of the media

The opposition parties believe that the OSCE/ODIHR’s final assessment provides a legal and logical basis for fulfilling the demands of the public and holding new elections.

Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge

Share This Article
Leave a Comment