Here’s a summary of the article and its conclusions:
**Summary**
The article discusses the latest proposal from the US regarding Ukraine‘s natural resources, which is seen as an attempt to exploit the war for economic gain. The proposal, unveiled on February 22, would give the US a significant share (66%) of revenues from these resources over 10 years, with no clear security guarantees or EU involvement. This has sparked concerns among Europeans, who view it as a threat to their investments in Ukraine.
**Ukraine’s Position**
The article notes that Ukraine is resisting this proposal, citing concerns about sovereignty and the loss of occupied territories. President Zelensky has stated that Ukraine will not sign an agreement without security and fairness, and Parliament Speaker Ruslan Stefanchuk has confirmed that legal analysis will begin on February 24.
**Risks vs. Benefits**
The article highlights several risks associated with this proposal, including:
1. Economic loss: Losing 66% of resource revenues could weaken the budget and have significant economic consequences.
2. Security vulnerability: Without guarantees, Russia may continue to launch attacks, and US troops at resource sites could become targets.
3. Political pressure: The threat to cut off Starlink and weapons could cripple Ukraine’s Armed Forces, forcing Zelensky to give in.
**Benefits**
However, the article also notes that there are some potential benefits for Ukraine, including:
1. Short-term aid: Preservation of Starlink and $50 billion per year in weapons would allow Ukraine to hold the front.
2. Investments: Cooperation with the US could accelerate resource extraction by attracting technology and capital.
3. Geopolitical signal: The agreement would tie the US to Ukraine, potentially deterring Russia.
**Conclusion**
The article concludes that the risks associated with this proposal outweigh its benefits unless the agreement is revised. It recommends that Kyiv postpone signing until security guarantees are included and reduce the US share to 15-20% over 10 years, with EU involvement as a balancing factor.