Ucha Nanuashvili says it is a shame that the majority did not see the dangers and risks created by the adoption the Russian law. The court, with the exception of two people, has lost the independence it once had.  

AI

It is a shame that the majority of of the court failed to see the serious dangers and risks that the adoption by the Russian law created the country. of the “Democracy Center” told journalists that the court, with the exception of two people, had lost the independence it once enjoyed the society.
He noted that the court had sufficient time and resources to reach a different conclusion.
“Thank you to two who made a decision that should have come from an independent judge. In other cases, the majority of members of the court failed to see the serious dangers and risks that the adoption Russian law created for the country. Except for two people, the court lost its independence in the society. This is unfortunate. They had the time and resources available to make a different decision. Nanuashvili stated that the court should have recognized the contradiction between the Constitution and the adopted law.
Information: The has not accepted the request to suspend “The transparency of influences” law. The court has recognized that the lawsuits submitted are partially admissible. This means that substantive discussions will start. Two judges of the Constitutional Court of also expressed different opinions on the law “On transparency of external influence”. The Constitutional Court of Georgia published the different opinions of two judges – Giorgi Tughushi and Teimuraz Kverenchkhiladze. It turns out that two judges, Giorgi Kverenchkhiladze & Teimuraz Tughushi, believe the Constitutional Court of Georgia was wrong to accept the petition of claimant & suspend the operation of disputed norms of law “On Transparency of Foreign Influence”.
We are talking about the Norms that include: the obligation to register names of as “organizations pursuing the interests of an external power” in the register and the same status, as well as access to information protected by organizations, and the obligation of publishing information containing personal information.

 

Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge

Share This Article
Leave a Comment