Salome Zurabishvili, who was the candidate for Prime Minister at the time, decided to not submit her candidacy before the election, but after. This was in response to Gia Volski’s statement.
According to him, “Salome Zurabishvili portrayed such an absurd image that was easily deciphered by society“.
Volski claims that Salome Zurabishvili’s withdrawal of this plan was not due to the opposition but to the society.
“Salome Zurabishvili’s plan, the idea was that she would present herself as the opposition leader. Salome Zurabishvili was not given the opportunity to run for Prime Minister by the opposition when the elections approached. The idea was to inform the people that a bloody “national movement” would not be coming but instead a technical, intelligent government would rule Georgia for a period of time. This was absurd and unconstitutional on one hand, yet on the other, the reality of the “national movement” that was constantly preached couldn’t be hidden behind a fig leaf. Salome Zurabishvili’s decision to withdraw this plan was due to the fact that it was easily understood by the society, not the opposition. Salome Zurabishvili’s plan was withdrawn because it was easily understood by the society. He painted a picture that was easily understood by the society and, of course, was not allowed to grow. Volski said, “I thought that the issue would be agreed on and then this collective, “national movement”, would reveal its dark sides, but this didn’t happen.”
Salome Zurabishvili announced that she would nominate a candidate to be the Prime Minister of Georgia after the elections because she was “reporting” to the four parties that signed the “Georgian Charter“.
The President believes that a neutral Prime Minister, who is not a politician in the sense that “he does not come from political parties”, would make it easier for parties to reconcile.
Read More @ www.interpressnews.ge