**UK and US Plan “Reassurance Force” for Ukraine**
A potential Western troop deployment to Ukraine is being discussed in London. But defence and diplomatic sources say it should not be called a “peacekeeping force”. Instead, they call it a “reassurance force”.
The purpose of this deployment would be to help Ukraine feel safer by providing air cover and a naval presence in the Black Sea. This could make trade and travel easier.
**Limited Military Impact**
The planned force of around 20,000 troops is not big enough to enforce peace. Their main job would be to protect cities, ports, and major energy infrastructure. They might even stay away from areas near the front line to reassure Russia that they mean no harm.
**Not a Traditional Peacekeeping Force**
Sources say this deployment should not be called a “peacekeeping force” because it is not impartial like traditional peacekeepers. These troops would support Ukraine and try to deter future Russian aggression.
Their role would not involve monitoring any ceasefire, which would be done by Ukrainian troops on the front line and Western surveillance assets in the air and space.
**Limited Military Impact**
The military impact of this deployment would be limited compared to the number of troops already fighting in Ukraine. Russia has a large army, while Ukraine has almost a million military personnel.
**US Role Uncertain**
There is uncertainty about whether the US would provide any air, satellite, or intelligence cover for any European force on the ground. The US has said it would not provide a “backstop” of military support.
The UK and others are planning to move ahead with organizing their own force without asking the US to join in. They will then see if the US is willing to play a role once the details are agreed.