Kakha Kaladze says the Constitutional Court’s decision was clear. How can transparency be bad? It is unimaginable. Even an ordinary citizen should have the right to know who finances the insulting the church, swearing at the patriarch and revolutionary scenario.  

AI

The decision of the should make everything clear. Even an ordinary citizen should be able to tell who is funding, for example the insulting the church, the swearing in of the patriarch or the revolutionary scenario.
According to the polarization has been sparked by foreign partners who criticize due to the on the “” of foreign influence.
“The Constitutional Court’s decision was clear. It is hard to imagine how transparency could be bad. On one hand they say that transparency is important and we should move forward in a direction. On the other, they tell it is bad for them because they are concerned about their finances. It should be made clear who is responsible for the funding and what it is spent on. This is not done because they, their , fuel polarization.
Remember that they told you that the government needed to take steps to reduce polarization? Yes sir, we’re ready to do anything to achieve that. They tell us that, but on the other hand they finance extremism, revolution, traditions, and the insulting values which are dear to all , leading to conflict and strife between people. Kaladze stated that everything should be made clear. An ordinary citizen should know who finances, say, insulting the Church, who finances patriarchal swearing, or who finances the revolutionary scenario.

 

Read More @ www..ge

Share This Article
Leave a comment