The article discusses the potential consequences of a partitioned Ukraine, in light of President–elect Donald Trump‘s campaign promises and cabinet nominations that suggest a more conciliatory approach towards Russia. The author highlights the historical precedents for partitions leading to ongoing conflicts, terrorism, and instability, citing examples from India and Pakistan, Vietnam, Palestine, and others.
The article argues that a partitioned Ukraine would lead to long-term hostility, oppression, terrorism, and wars, referencing the devastating effects of previous partitions on these countries. It notes that Ukrainians have demonstrated courage and dynamism in fighting for their territorial integrity since 2022 and will likely resist quietly submitting to the idea of partition.
The author emphasizes the importance of ironclad international security guarantees, including potential NATO membership, as a means to prevent further Russian interference and ensure Ukrainian sovereignty. The article concludes by warning that post-partition terrorism may come to Russia on a greater scale than the Chechens ever imagined if Trump does not persuade the Kremlin of the need for fair negotiations.
The tone of the article is one of concern and warning, with the author advocating for diplomatic efforts to prevent a partitioned Ukraine from becoming another conflict-prone example in history.