Ucha Nanuashvili says it is a shame that the majority did not see the dangers and risks created by the adoption the Russian law. The court, with the exception of two people, has lost the independence it once had.  

AI

It is a shame that the majority of members of the court failed see the serious dangers and risks that the adoption by the law created the country. of the “Democracy Research Center” told that the court, with the exception of two people, had lost the independence it once enjoyed in the society.
He noted that the court had sufficient time and resources to reach a different conclusion.
“Thank you to two judges who made a decision that should have come from independent judge. In other cases, the majority of members of the court failed to see the serious dangers and risks that the adoption Russian law created for the country. Except for two people, the court lost its independence in the society. This is unfortunate. They had the time and resources available to make a different decision. Nanuashvili stated that the court should have recognized the contradiction between the Constitution and the adopted law.
Information: The Constitutional Court of Georgia has not accepted the request to suspend “The of foreign influences” law. The court has recognized that the lawsuits submitted are partially admissible. This means that substantive discussions will start. Two judges of the Constitutional Court of Georgia also expressed different opinions the law “On transparency of external influence”. The Constitutional Court of Georgia published the different opinions of two judges – and Teimuraz Kverenchkhiladze. It turns out that two judges, Giorgi Kverenchkhiladze & Teimuraz Tughushi, believe the Constitutional Court of Georgia was wrong to accept the petition of claimant & suspend the operation of disputed norms of law “On Transparency of Foreign Influence”.
We are talking about the Norms that include: the obligation to register names of organizations as “organizations pursuing the interests of an external power” in the register and the same status, as well as access to information protected by organizations, and the obligation of publishing information containing personal information.

 

Read More @ www..ge

Share This Article
Leave a Comment