**US Officials Condemn Russian Attack on Ukraine, But No Increased Pressure on Moscow**
The United States has offered its condolences to Ukraine after a deadly Russian missile attack on the city of Sumy, but did not call for increased pressure or sanctions on Russia. The attack, which occurred on Palm Sunday, killed at least 34 people and injured 117, including children.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X, “The United States extends our deepest condolences to the victims of today’s horrifying Russian missile attack on Sumy.” However, his statement did not include condemnation of Russia’s actions or calls for increased sanctions on Moscow. This is notable compared to responses from European leaders, who condemned the attack as a war crime and demanded intensified pressure on Russia.
Special Envoy Keith Kellogg also commented on the attack, saying it “crosses any line of decency.” However, like Rubio, he did not explicitly call for increased pressure or sanctions on Moscow. Instead, he echoed earlier remarks by US President Donald Trump‘s administration, which is trying to end the war and achieve durable peace.
The European response was more robust, with leaders such as Finnish President Alexander Stubb condemning Russia’s actions and calling for an unconditional ceasefire. UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer also condemned the attack and called for Russia to accept a full ceasefire.
**Analysis**
The US response to the Russian attack on Sumy is puzzling, given the scale of the tragedy and the strong condemnation from European leaders. One possible explanation is that the Trump administration is still trying to negotiate with Russia, despite Moscow’s continued refusal to accept Washington’s proposal for a complete ceasefire.
However, this approach may not be effective in stopping the violence and promoting peace in Ukraine. As one analyst noted, “Russia shows no respect for international law or humanitarian law,” and therefore requires stronger pressure from the international community.
In contrast, European leaders seem to have taken a more robust stance, recognizing that Ukraine has already agreed to accept Washington’s proposal for a complete ceasefire while Russia continues to refuse the terms. Their demand for intensified pressure on Moscow is likely to be more effective in promoting peace in Ukraine.
**Commentary**
The US response to the Russian attack on Sumy highlights the ongoing challenge of finding an effective way to end the war in Ukraine. While the Trump administration’s efforts to negotiate with Russia are understandable, they may not be sufficient to stop the violence and promote peace.
As one analyst noted, “We want to end this war this year, but it is important not to manipulate.” This comment highlights the need for a more robust international response to the crisis in Ukraine, including stronger pressure on Moscow and greater support for Kyiv’s efforts to defend itself against Russian aggression.
Ultimately, the international community must take a firmer stance against Russia’s actions in Ukraine. The US should work with European leaders to impose stronger sanctions and provide greater military aid to Ukraine, while also supporting diplomatic efforts to promote peace in the region. Anything less will only prolong the suffering of the Ukrainian people and embolden Russian aggression.