The article discusses the potential implications of Trump‘s administration picks for Ukraine. The key points are:
1. **Trump has chosen more ambiguous candidates**: Unlike Pompeo and Haley, who were strong supporters of Ukraine, Trump has picked more ambiguous candidates like Waltz and Rubio.
2. **Waltz and Rubio have a mixed record on Ukraine**: While they may be supportive of Ukraine in some areas, their record is not as strong as that of Pompeo and Haley.
3. **Trump’s administration is likely to prioritize Russia over Ukraine**: Despite the presence of some pro-Ukraine candidates, Trump’s administration is expected to prioritize Russia due to his own views on the issue.
4. **Pompeo and Haley’s exclusion from the team suggests a pro-Russia agenda**: The fact that these two strong supporters of Ukraine were not included in Trump’s team has raised concerns about his intentions regarding Ukraine.
Some quotes from experts:
* “Even some of those individuals mentioned as possible picks who used to be very hawkish on Russia, such as Rubio, have changed their positions in recent years, aligning themselves much more with Trump.” – Ruth Deyermond
* “The announcement that Trump won’t be appointing either Pompeo or Haley is a confirmation of what was already obvious. The new Trump administration is likely to align much more with Russia than with the U.S. allies on Ukraine.” – Deyermond
* “Few in his administration will want to prioritize or focus on Ukraine because of where Trump is on Russia.” – Bergmann
Overall, the article suggests that Trump’s administration picks are a cause for concern regarding Ukraine, and that the country may face challenges in getting the support it needs from the US government.